World

APF demands guarantees for patients of closed fertility clinic

The APF has appealed to the Ministry of Health to ensure support for patients of the closed assisted reproduction clinic in Cascais, who have embryos and gametes stored.

2 September 2026Tagblick Newsdesk

AI-generatedWritten by an AI system, editorially responsible — how we work

Archive photo: APF demands guarantees for patients of closed fertility clinic — Archive photoPhoto: BruceBlaus . When using this image in external sources it can be cited as: Blausen.com staff (2014). " Medical gallery of Blausen Medical 2014 ". WikiJournal of Medicine 1 (2). DOI : 10.15347/wjm/2014.010 . ISSN 2002-4436 . · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY 3.0

The Portuguese Fertility Association (APF) has requested immediate guarantees from the Ministry of Health and the CNPMA regarding the patients of the assisted reproduction clinic that closed in Cascais. The APF believes that these patients cannot be left without information about the status of their treatments.

The APF highlighted that many patients have embryos and gametes stored but are facing the suspension of treatments. This situation creates significant uncertainty for patients, who lack information about the continuity of their care.

The association calls for swift action from health authorities, reminding that a lack of response could have serious consequences for those involved. The APF emphasizes the need for immediate and effective support during the transition of care.

Patients of the clinic find themselves in a vulnerable position, as the treatments they were undergoing were interrupted without prior warning. The lack of communication has generated concern and discomfort among patients.

The APF's appeal aims to ensure that the health and reproductive rights of patients are respected and protected during this transition process.

This item was written by an AI system on the basis of the headlines and short teasers of the independently operating newsrooms named below. We disclose this under Art. 50(4), second subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act). Before publication we check origin and verifiability — anything that appears in only one place is not published — as well as language, substance and legally sensitive content. No separate substantive review of each individual item by a natural person takes place; we therefore do not rely on the exemption in Art. 50(4), second subparagraph, of the AI Act. Editorial responsibility for this publication rests with the person named in the imprint (§ 18 Abs. 2 MStV). Please report errors to [email protected] — we will correct or remove the item. Full reports are available from the sources listed.