World

DRC and M23 agree on roadmap for peace negotiations

The government of the Democratic Republic of the Congo and the M23 movement have reached a roadmap agreement for peace talks in Switzerland.

23 August 2026Tagblick Newsdesk

AI-generatedWritten by an AI system, editorially responsible — how we work

Archive photo: DRC and M23 agree on roadmap for peace negotiations — Archive photoPhoto: Lydie maliki · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 4.0

The Doha process, involving the government of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and the Alliance Fleuve Congo/March 23 Movement (AFC/M23), has taken a significant step with the conclusion of a new roadmap for peace negotiations. This agreement was established following discussions held in Bern, Switzerland.

According to a joint statement, this roadmap outlines clear stages and timelines for the talks, aiming to end the clashes that have led to numerous casualties and massive population displacements in the region.

The DRC and the M23, a rebel group supported by Rwanda, also expressed their gratitude to Qatar and other partners for their support of peace and stability in eastern DRC and the Great Lakes region.

This development has been widely covered by various media outlets, including AFP, which reported the details of this agreement. Congolese authorities and representatives of the M23 have demonstrated their commitment to pursuing constructive negotiations towards a lasting solution.

The negotiation timeline established in the roadmap aims to ensure that discussions progress in an organized and effective manner, marking a new phase in the peace process under international mediation.

The agreement reached in Switzerland is seen as a crucial opportunity to improve the security situation in the region, although significant challenges remain.

This item was written by an AI system on the basis of the headlines and short teasers of the independently operating newsrooms named below. We disclose this under Art. 50(4), second subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act). Before publication we check origin and verifiability — anything that appears in only one place is not published — as well as language, substance and legally sensitive content. No separate substantive review of each individual item by a natural person takes place; we therefore do not rely on the exemption in Art. 50(4), second subparagraph, of the AI Act. Editorial responsibility for this publication rests with the person named in the imprint (§ 18 Abs. 2 MStV). Please report errors to [email protected] — we will correct or remove the item. Full reports are available from the sources listed.