Panorama

Feyenoord identifies dozens of individuals after fireworks incident at SC Cambuur

Feyenoord has identified several dozen people involved in the fireworks incident during the away match against SC Cambuur, which may lead to stadium bans.

28 August 2026Tagblick Newsdesk

AI-generatedWritten by an AI system, editorially responsible — how we work

Archive photo: Feyenoord identifies dozens of individuals after fireworks incident at SC Cambuur — Archive photoPhoto: Michielverbeek · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 4.0

Feyenoord has identified several dozen individuals who may face a stadium ban following the fireworks violence during the away match against SC Cambuur. This was announced by the club on Friday.

During the match, which took place on Sunday, fans in the away section threw fireworks. This led to disturbances that resulted in injuries to seven Cambuur supporters.

The club reports that the process of image analysis and identification of those involved is currently underway. Feyenoord is examining further actions against the individuals implicated in the incident.

Feyenoord emphasizes that the individuals involved will need to surrender their away cards, meaning they will not be welcome in the stadium for the time being.

Several news sources, including NOS and De Telegraaf, confirm that it concerns 'several dozen people' who have been identified as being involved in the incident.

The identification of these individuals follows a concerning situation regarding safety in stadiums, and Feyenoord appears to be taking the matter seriously by taking action.

This item was written by an AI system on the basis of the headlines and short teasers of the independently operating newsrooms named below. We disclose this under Art. 50(4), second subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act). Before publication we check origin and verifiability — anything that appears in only one place is not published — as well as language, substance and legally sensitive content. No separate substantive review of each individual item by a natural person takes place; we therefore do not rely on the exemption in Art. 50(4), second subparagraph, of the AI Act. Editorial responsibility for this publication rests with the person named in the imprint (§ 18 Abs. 2 MStV). Please report errors to [email protected] — we will correct or remove the item. Full reports are available from the sources listed.