Finance

Lula and Trump discuss tariffs and organized crime over the phone

Brazilian President Lula da Silva contacted Donald Trump to discuss tariffs and security issues.

21 August 2026Tagblick Newsdesk

AI-generatedWritten by an AI system, editorially responsible — how we work

Archive photo: Lula and Trump discuss tariffs and organized crime over the phone — Archive photoPhoto: The White House · Wikimedia Commons · Public domain

On Friday, Brazilian President Lula da Silva called U.S. President Donald Trump to discuss issues related to tariffs, international conflicts, and organized crime. According to information from the Brazilian government, the conversation lasted one hour and 20 minutes and was conducted in a cordial manner.

The two presidents addressed the tariffs imposed by the United States on Brazil. Lula described Washington's justifications for the surcharges as "unfounded." During the call, both sides agreed to resume trade negotiations "as soon as possible."

Lula and Trump also discussed the impact of tariffs on trade relations between the two countries. This communication marks a step in efforts by both to resolve the existing trade tensions between Brazil and the United States.

In addition to tariffs, organized crime was one of the highlighted topics. The dialogue included concerns about internal security and the necessary collaboration between the two leaders in the fight against this phenomenon.

According to the Palácio do Planalto, the conversation between Lula and Trump was characterized by a friendly tone, underscoring the importance of dialogue between the nations.

This phone call takes place in the context of seeking a closer understanding, with an emphasis on trade and security issues, reflecting the need for cooperation between the two countries.

This item was written by an AI system on the basis of the headlines and short teasers of the independently operating newsrooms named below. We disclose this under Art. 50(4), second subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act). Before publication we check origin and verifiability — anything that appears in only one place is not published — as well as language, substance and legally sensitive content. No separate substantive review of each individual item by a natural person takes place; we therefore do not rely on the exemption in Art. 50(4), second subparagraph, of the AI Act. Editorial responsibility for this publication rests with the person named in the imprint (§ 18 Abs. 2 MStV). Please report errors to [email protected] — we will correct or remove the item. Full reports are available from the sources listed.