World

Neutrogena admits responsibility in Hayden Panettiere case

The cosmetics brand acknowledges it left actress Hayden Panettiere "helpless" after terminating her contract in 2015.

21 August 2026Tagblick Newsdesk

AI-generatedWritten by an AI system, editorially responsible — how we work

Archive photo: Neutrogena admits responsibility in Hayden Panettiere case — Archive photoPhoto: Toglenn · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 3.0

Neutrogena has admitted that it left actress Hayden Panettiere "helpless" after canceling her contract in 2015, coincidentally following her disclosure of struggles with postpartum depression. The cosmetics brand made this statement amid criticism and controversy regarding its relationship with the artist.

The brand's acknowledgment comes after Panettiere's death, which occurred four days ago, during ongoing police investigations related to the circumstances of her passing. In an effort to mitigate the negative fallout, Neutrogena announced a financial contribution aimed at women's health.

The actress, known for her roles in various productions, publicly battled depression, a fact that became more widely discussed following her death. In her later years, the challenges she faced had a profound impact on her career and personal life.

Reports indicated that by terminating the contract, the company appeared to overlook Panettiere's struggles, sparking an intense debate about the responsibility of brands to support their representatives during vulnerable times.

Neutrogena's statement was seen as a response to a wave of criticism that emerged after the revelation of Hayden Panettiere's struggles, highlighting the need for more support and understanding regarding the mental health of public figures.

This item was written by an AI system on the basis of the headlines and short teasers of the independently operating newsrooms named below. We disclose this under Art. 50(4), second subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act). Before publication we check origin and verifiability — anything that appears in only one place is not published — as well as language, substance and legally sensitive content. No separate substantive review of each individual item by a natural person takes place; we therefore do not rely on the exemption in Art. 50(4), second subparagraph, of the AI Act. Editorial responsibility for this publication rests with the person named in the imprint (§ 18 Abs. 2 MStV). Please report errors to [email protected] — we will correct or remove the item. Full reports are available from the sources listed.