Panorama

Nick Kyrgios suspended temporarily after positive cocaine test

Australian tennis player Nick Kyrgios has confirmed his suspension following a positive test for cocaine during a tournament in Mallorca.

19 August 2026Tagblick Newsdesk

AI-generatedWritten by an AI system, editorially responsible — how we work

Nick Kyrgios suspended temporarily after positive cocaine test — Photo: Kulitat · Flickr · BY-SA

Nick Kyrgios, the 31-year-old Australian tennis player and 2022 Wimbledon finalist, has been provisionally suspended following a positive doping test. The suspension was confirmed by the International Tennis Integrity Agency (ITIA).

The positive test occurred during the ATP 250 tournament in Mallorca at the end of June. Kyrgios' urine sample revealed a metabolite of cocaine, according to the ITIA.

Kyrgios has acknowledged his wrongdoing and apologized to his fans, family, and sponsors. He stated that he made a 'huge mistake.'

The player, who has not competed frequently recently, shared the details of the suspension via social media, expressing a desire for his followers to hear the information directly from him.

Kyrgios has been known for his controversial behavior both on and off the court, and this suspension marks a new chapter in his career. It remains unclear how long the suspension will last and what impact it will have on his future participation in tournaments.

Kyrgios' message underscores the seriousness of doping controls in sports, given the implications for athletes who test positive for banned substances.

This item was written by an AI system on the basis of the headlines and short teasers of the independently operating newsrooms named below. We disclose this under Art. 50(4), second subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act). Before publication we check origin and verifiability — anything that appears in only one place is not published — as well as language, substance and legally sensitive content. No separate substantive review of each individual item by a natural person takes place; we therefore do not rely on the exemption in Art. 50(4), second subparagraph, of the AI Act. Editorial responsibility for this publication rests with the person named in the imprint (§ 18 Abs. 2 MStV). Please report errors to [email protected] — we will correct or remove the item. Full reports are available from the sources listed.