World

Susan Sarandon criticizes loss of roles for her support of Palestine in Venice

Actress Susan Sarandon claims that her defense of Palestine has impacted her film career.

7 September 2026Tagblick Newsdesk

AI-generatedWritten by an AI system, editorially responsible — how we work

Susan Sarandon criticizes loss of roles for her support of Palestine in Venice — Photo: Pedro J Pacheco · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 4.0

At the Venice Film Festival, actress Susan Sarandon stated that she has lost opportunities in the film industry due to her criticism of Israel and her support for Palestine. In her speech, she claimed that her activism has led to her exclusion from various projects in Hollywood.

At 79 years old, Sarandon has been an active voice on issues related to Palestine, particularly in the context of the Gaza conflict. Her support has sparked controversy and has had repercussions on her professional career, according to her own testimony at the festival.

Archive photo: Susan Sarandon criticizes loss of roles for her support of Palestine in Venice — Archive photoPhoto: Becker1999 · Flickr · BY

The actress is not the only public figure to face difficulties due to her political stance, but her case highlights how activism can affect careers in the entertainment industry. At the Italian event, Sarandon stressed the importance of standing up for her beliefs despite the consequences.

Media outlets such as Infobae, Clarín, La Nación, and Al Jazeera have covered Sarandon's statements, emphasizing her commitment to the Palestinian cause and the tensions this has generated in her career.

This item was written by an AI system on the basis of the headlines and short teasers of the independently operating newsrooms named below. We disclose this under Art. 50(4), second subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act). Before publication we check origin and verifiability — anything that appears in only one place is not published — as well as language, substance and legally sensitive content. No separate substantive review of each individual item by a natural person takes place; we therefore do not rely on the exemption in Art. 50(4), second subparagraph, of the AI Act. Editorial responsibility for this publication rests with the person named in the imprint (§ 18 Abs. 2 MStV). Please report errors to [email protected] — we will correct or remove the item. Full reports are available from the sources listed.