Panorama

Tetris threatens legal action against the White House over video game

Tetris has denied any connection to the video game 'Build the Wall', released by the White House.

4 September 2026Tagblick Newsdesk

AI-generatedWritten by an AI system, editorially responsible — how we work

Archive photo: Tetris threatens legal action against the White House over video game — Archive photoPhoto: Nelo Hotsuma · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY 2.0

The company behind the famous game Tetris has announced that it is considering legal action against the White House due to the release of a video game titled 'Build the Wall'. This game is inspired by the aesthetics of Tetris and was published as part of a retro gaming platform that promotes various policies of President Donald Trump, including the construction of a barrier at the border.

According to reports, Tetris denied any collaboration in the development of 'Build the Wall', reiterating that its values are based on unity rather than division. The company expressed its seriousness regarding copyright infringements in a statement released through its social media channels.

The White House has included 'Build the Wall' among several retro games inspired by titles from Sega and other consoles, in an attempt to appeal to an audience that supports its immigration policies.

Tetris's announcement has generated attention in both U.S. and international media, underscoring the use of pop culture elements in the context of current politics, especially related to sensitive issues such as immigration.

This item was written by an AI system on the basis of the headlines and short teasers of the independently operating newsrooms named below. We disclose this under Art. 50(4), second subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act). Before publication we check origin and verifiability — anything that appears in only one place is not published — as well as language, substance and legally sensitive content. No separate substantive review of each individual item by a natural person takes place; we therefore do not rely on the exemption in Art. 50(4), second subparagraph, of the AI Act. Editorial responsibility for this publication rests with the person named in the imprint (§ 18 Abs. 2 MStV). Please report errors to [email protected] — we will correct or remove the item. Full reports are available from the sources listed.