World

Alcolumbre dismisses new impeachment requests against Moraes

Senate President Davi Alcolumbre states he will not proceed with new impeachment requests against STF Minister Alexandre de Moraes and criticizes the number of existing requests.

2 September 2026Tagblick Newsdesk

AI-generatedWritten by an AI system, editorially responsible — how we work

Alcolumbre dismisses new impeachment requests against Moraes — Photo: Impeachment Fora Moraes Xandão · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 4.0

Senate President Davi Alcolumbre (União-AP) announced that he does not intend to move forward with new impeachment requests against Supreme Federal Court (STF) Minister Alexandre de Moraes. The statement was made during an interview on Tuesday (1st).

Alcolumbre also commented that the current number of impeachment requests directed at STF ministers is not considered normal. He referred to 109 impeachment requests that have been recorded, stating that this situation is unusual and raises concerns.

The issue arose after new messages between Alexandre de Moraes and Daniel Vorcaro from Master bank. However, the Senate President chose not to address the specific content of these communications.

In his statements, Alcolumbre mentioned that opinions should not be formed about the exchange of messages, emphasizing that the only aspect he discusses is the excessive number of impeachment requests concerning STF ministers.

The situation has sparked debates among politicians and the public, reflecting tensions in the political arena, although Alcolumbre has decided not to proceed with further actions against Moraes.

This item was written by an AI system on the basis of the headlines and short teasers of the independently operating newsrooms named below. We disclose this under Art. 50(4), second subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act). Before publication we check origin and verifiability — anything that appears in only one place is not published — as well as language, substance and legally sensitive content. No separate substantive review of each individual item by a natural person takes place; we therefore do not rely on the exemption in Art. 50(4), second subparagraph, of the AI Act. Editorial responsibility for this publication rests with the person named in the imprint (§ 18 Abs. 2 MStV). Please report errors to [email protected] — we will correct or remove the item. Full reports are available from the sources listed.