Panorama

Anis Hadj Moussa late and does not play against NEC

Feyenoord's Anis Hadj Moussa missed the match against NEC after repeatedly arriving late. Coach Van Bronckhorst states he is not leaving.

5 September 2026Tagblick Newsdesk

AI-generatedWritten by an AI system, editorially responsible — how we work

Archive photo: Anis Hadj Moussa late and does not play against NEC — Archive photoPhoto: Carlo Bruil Fotografie · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY 2.0

Anis Hadj Moussa, the forward for Feyenoord, was unavailable for the match against NEC on Saturday. He arrived late for the departure of the team bus to Nijmegen, which led to his exclusion from the squad for this game.

According to various sources, Hadj Moussa not only arrived late but also decided to go home afterwards. This behavior has contributed to the ongoing uncertainty surrounding his transfer situation.

The situation surrounding Hadj Moussa is persistent and continues to capture attention. The player is the subject of rumors and speculation regarding a potential move.

Coach Giovanni van Bronckhorst responded to the events and stated that Hadj Moussa is 'absolutely not going anywhere'. This seems to imply that the club has confidence in the player's situation and future.

The transfer saga of Hadj Moussa, who previously played for Patro Eisden, raises several questions about his position within the team and his commitment. Fans and analysts are closely monitoring this situation.

Despite the issues, it remains unclear what the future holds for Hadj Moussa at Feyenoord, especially with ongoing speculation regarding his transfer.

This item was written by an AI system on the basis of the headlines and short teasers of the independently operating newsrooms named below. We disclose this under Art. 50(4), second subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act). Before publication we check origin and verifiability — anything that appears in only one place is not published — as well as language, substance and legally sensitive content. No separate substantive review of each individual item by a natural person takes place; we therefore do not rely on the exemption in Art. 50(4), second subparagraph, of the AI Act. Editorial responsibility for this publication rests with the person named in the imprint (§ 18 Abs. 2 MStV). Please report errors to [email protected] — we will correct or remove the item. Full reports are available from the sources listed.