World

Death Toll Rises in Gujarat Spurious Liquor Case

The number of fatalities linked to the consumption of spurious liquor in Gujarat has increased, with several others hospitalized.

20 August 2026Tagblick Newsdesk

AI-generatedWritten by an AI system, editorially responsible — how we work

Archive photo: Death Toll Rises in Gujarat Spurious Liquor Case — Archive photoPhoto: Gujarat Tourist Guide · Flickr · BY

The consumption of spurious liquor in Kharakadi village in Gujarat has led to multiple fatalities and hospitalizations. According to reports, the death toll has reached seven, while over 30 individuals have been hospitalized due to alcohol poisoning. Bhavnagar Collector Manish Kumar stated that of the 18 patients receiving treatment, two are in critical condition, four are in the ICU, and two are on ventilators, with 10 others in stable condition.

Initially, four deaths were confirmed, and reports indicated that 19 individuals were hospitalized after consuming the toxic liquor. Police have since detained 12 suspected bootleggers in connection with this incident, with an FIR (First Information Report) filed against 21 persons.

Authorities are continuing their investigation into the case, focusing on the illegal nature of the liquor that was consumed. The victims had reportedly consumed the liquor on Tuesday night before falling severely ill.

This incident has highlighted ongoing concerns regarding the sale of illegal liquor in 'dry' Gujarat, where the sale of alcohol is prohibited. Further details are awaited as the police continue their inquiries into the event.

This item was written by an AI system on the basis of the headlines and short teasers of the independently operating newsrooms named below. We disclose this under Art. 50(4), second subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act). Before publication we check origin and verifiability — anything that appears in only one place is not published — as well as language, substance and legally sensitive content. No separate substantive review of each individual item by a natural person takes place; we therefore do not rely on the exemption in Art. 50(4), second subparagraph, of the AI Act. Editorial responsibility for this publication rests with the person named in the imprint (§ 18 Abs. 2 MStV). Please report errors to [email protected] — we will correct or remove the item. Full reports are available from the sources listed.