Domestic

IOC announces six competitors for Munich in bid for 2036 Olympics

The International Olympic Committee has revealed which countries are competing with Munich for the 2036 Olympic Games.

7 October 2026Tagblick Newsdesk

AI-generatedWritten by an AI system, editorially responsible — how we work

Archive photo: IOC announces six competitors for Munich in bid for 2036 Olympics — Archive photoPhoto: Martin Rulsch , Wikimedia Commons · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 4.0

The International Olympic Committee (IOC) has officially announced the competitors for the 2036 Summer Olympics. Munich, the German city vying to host the Games, will face challenges from six other countries.

The six competing bidders include Qatar, India, South Korea, Hungary, Turkey, and South Africa. These countries are considered significant contenders in the current bidding period.

The German bid has positioned itself in an international context and is now competing with the mentioned countries, each facing various challenges in securing support from their respective national states.

The announcement was made on Tuesday, updating the IOC's list of candidates for hosting the 2036 Olympic Games. This information has been confirmed by various media sources.

Munich stands out as one of the most prominent contenders and hopes to win support for hosting the Olympics in Germany. The competition with the other candidates is viewed as significant.

The awarding of the 2036 Summer Olympics is being closely monitored internationally, with the IOC's decision on the host city set to be made in the coming years. The evaluation of the bids will play a central role, as the selection could take place among several continents.

This item was written by an AI system on the basis of the headlines and short teasers of the independently operating newsrooms named below. We disclose this under Art. 50(4), second subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act). Before publication we check origin and verifiability — anything that appears in only one place is not published — as well as language, substance and legally sensitive content. No separate substantive review of each individual item by a natural person takes place; we therefore do not rely on the exemption in Art. 50(4), second subparagraph, of the AI Act. Editorial responsibility for this publication rests with the person named in the imprint (§ 18 Abs. 2 MStV). Please report errors to [email protected] — we will correct or remove the item. Full reports are available from the sources listed.