World

Magaly Medina questions Jefferson Farfán's psychological therapies

Host Magaly Medina criticizes Jefferson Farfán for failing to show attendance at his psychological therapies, presenting a court document on her program.

4 September 2026Tagblick Newsdesk

AI-generatedWritten by an AI system, editorially responsible — how we work

Archive photo: Magaly Medina questions Jefferson Farfán's psychological therapies — Archive photoPhoto: José Luis Sánchez Mesa · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY 2.0

Magaly Medina presented a document from the 15th Family Court in her program that questions whether Jefferson Farfán has complied with the psychological therapies ordered for him. The host addressed the former footballer directly, asking him, 'Pisapaja, did you go to your therapy, yes or no?'.

According to Medina, the record submitted by Farfán only includes one appointment in the mental health area and does not prove that he attended the required sessions. This has led the host to reopen the discussion on her show, 'Magaly TV, la firme'.

Furthermore, Medina targeted Paco Bazán for his connection to Farfán, suggesting that this support is inappropriate, and warned that she will act if necessary. The animosity between the individuals intensifies through their public statements.

Medina's accusations have reignited the debate about Farfán's compliance with the judicial measures imposed on him. The former footballer has not publicly responded to Medina's statements, leaving the matter unresolved.

This item was written by an AI system on the basis of the headlines and short teasers of the independently operating newsrooms named below. We disclose this under Art. 50(4), second subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act). Before publication we check origin and verifiability — anything that appears in only one place is not published — as well as language, substance and legally sensitive content. No separate substantive review of each individual item by a natural person takes place; we therefore do not rely on the exemption in Art. 50(4), second subparagraph, of the AI Act. Editorial responsibility for this publication rests with the person named in the imprint (§ 18 Abs. 2 MStV). Please report errors to [email protected] — we will correct or remove the item. Full reports are available from the sources listed.