World

Marques Mendes criticizes political tension and calls for democratic humility

In a speech at the PSD Summer University, Luís Marques Mendes addressed the need for dialogue between government and opposition.

27 August 2026Tagblick Newsdesk

AI-generatedWritten by an AI system, editorially responsible — how we work

Archive photo: Marques Mendes criticizes political tension and calls for democratic humility — Archive photoPhoto: Agencia LUSA · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY 3.0

Luís Marques Mendes, former leader of the PSD, used his speech at the party's Summer University to criticize the political tension characterizing the current situation in Portugal. Mendes called on both the government and the opposition to adopt a stance of 'democratic humility'.

Emphasizing the importance of collaboration among different political factions, Mendes stated that it is not viable to continue 'living in a perpetual election campaign'. This remark reinforces his stance on the necessity for a more constructive environment in political debate.

Mendes also commented on constitutional review, stating that it is not a priority at the moment, although it could be viewed as a positive opportunity if conducted in a 'surgical' manner.

The former PSD leader again referenced Francisco Pinto Balsemão, a symbol of the party's history, as part of the core of his address, which aimed not only to reflect on the past but also to consider Portugal's political future.

Furthermore, his criticism included the notion that dialogue between different ideologies should be prioritized, especially in times of polarization, to achieve more effective and lasting solutions.

In summary, Mendes's speech highlights a concern for the health of democracy in Portugal and underscores the need for a more respectful and collaborative approach among political forces.

This item was written by an AI system on the basis of the headlines and short teasers of the independently operating newsrooms named below. We disclose this under Art. 50(4), second subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act). Before publication we check origin and verifiability — anything that appears in only one place is not published — as well as language, substance and legally sensitive content. No separate substantive review of each individual item by a natural person takes place; we therefore do not rely on the exemption in Art. 50(4), second subparagraph, of the AI Act. Editorial responsibility for this publication rests with the person named in the imprint (§ 18 Abs. 2 MStV). Please report errors to [email protected] — we will correct or remove the item. Full reports are available from the sources listed.