Panorama

New York City bans the use of artificial intelligence in schools from September

New York City will implement restrictions on the use of artificial intelligence in schools, affecting 600,000 students starting in September.

3 September 2026Tagblick Newsdesk

AI-generatedWritten by an AI system, editorially responsible — how we work

Archive photo: New York City bans the use of artificial intelligence in schools from September — Archive photoPhoto: checoo · Flickr · BY

New York City has confirmed that starting in September, the use of artificial intelligence in schools will be prohibited, impacting approximately 600,000 students. This measure aims to regulate the use of emerging technologies in educational environments.

The decision involves not only the prohibition of artificial intelligence but also the implementation of limits on the amount of time students will spend in front of screens. This new regulation comes at a time when digital technologies have gained prominence in education.

New York's educational authorities have emphasized the need for a balance in the use of technological tools and the exposure time to devices, due to concerns about students' well-being. These restrictions are expected to alter the educational approach towards technology use.

The measure also reflects a growing interest in regulating the use of artificial intelligence in educational contexts around the world, where similar protocols are being considered.

The announcement of this prohibition follows an analysis of the potential negative effects of unregulated use of artificial intelligence in education and students' development.

Authorities will provide more details on how the prohibition will be implemented and monitored in the coming weeks to ensure an effective transition.

This item was written by an AI system on the basis of the headlines and short teasers of the independently operating newsrooms named below. We disclose this under Art. 50(4), second subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act). Before publication we check origin and verifiability — anything that appears in only one place is not published — as well as language, substance and legally sensitive content. No separate substantive review of each individual item by a natural person takes place; we therefore do not rely on the exemption in Art. 50(4), second subparagraph, of the AI Act. Editorial responsibility for this publication rests with the person named in the imprint (§ 18 Abs. 2 MStV). Please report errors to [email protected] — we will correct or remove the item. Full reports are available from the sources listed.