World

Reelections of Deputies in Rio de Janeiro: Results and Highlights

Candidates from various parties were re-elected as deputies in Rio de Janeiro with significant votes.

5 October 2026Tagblick Newsdesk

AI-generatedWritten by an AI system, editorially responsible — how we work

Reelections of Deputies in Rio de Janeiro: Results and Highlights — Photo: TV ALERJ · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY 3.0

Dr. Luizinho from the Progressive Party (PP) was re-elected as a federal deputy for Rio de Janeiro, receiving 213,904 votes, which represents 2.41% of valid votes, the highest in the state.

Márcio Canella from União Brasil also secured his re-election as a state deputy, with 197,178 votes, equating to 2.24% of valid votes, making it the second highest among the 70 elected in the state.

Another highlight, Lindbergh from the Workers' Party (PT), was re-elected as a federal deputy with 181,768 votes, which corresponds to 2.05% of valid votes, ranking as the third highest among the 46 elected.

Luciano Vieira from the Brazilian Social Democracy Party (PSDB) received 177,887 votes, representing 2.01%, and was re-elected as a federal deputy, achieving the fourth highest vote among the 46 elected.

In the context of the re-elections, Altineu Cortes and Sóstenes Cavalcante, both from PL, were re-elected as federal deputies, totaling 175,161 and 170,290 votes, respectively, with the fifth and seventh highest votes among the 46 elected.

The list of re-elected officials also includes state deputies such as Guilherme Delaroli and Rosenverg Reis, who received 166,374 and 139,866 votes, marking the fifth and sixth highest votes among the 70 elected in the state.

This item was written by an AI system on the basis of the headlines and short teasers of the independently operating newsrooms named below. We disclose this under Art. 50(4), second subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act). Before publication we check origin and verifiability — anything that appears in only one place is not published — as well as language, substance and legally sensitive content. No separate substantive review of each individual item by a natural person takes place; we therefore do not rely on the exemption in Art. 50(4), second subparagraph, of the AI Act. Editorial responsibility for this publication rests with the person named in the imprint (§ 18 Abs. 2 MStV). Please report errors to [email protected] — we will correct or remove the item. Full reports are available from the sources listed.