World

Rufián highlights Robles' lack of applause for Sánchez in Congress

Gabriel Rufián points out that Defense Minister Margarita Robles did not applaud Sánchez, which he considers a major issue for the president.

4 September 2026Tagblick Newsdesk

AI-generatedWritten by an AI system, editorially responsible — how we work

Rufián highlights Robles' lack of applause for Sánchez in Congress — Photo: Marcpuigperez · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 4.0

During a session in Congress, Gabriel Rufián, spokesperson for ERC, emphasized that the Prime Minister, Pedro Sánchez, faces a 'significant problem' due to Defense Minister Margarita Robles not applauding his speech. Rufián made this remark following Sánchez's intention to publish a dossier with reports on the crisis in Ceuta, allowing citizens to examine them directly.

Robles' gesture did not go unnoticed by other members of Congress, who also commented on it. Both ERC and UPN pointed out the minister's snub, suggesting that her lack of applause could have implications for Sánchez's image.

On another note, within the Government, concerns have grown regarding Robles' behavior, which has been considered unusual. She has been identified as a 'loose cannon.' This has led some to believe that her attitude might compromise the stability of the current administration.

Archive photo: Rufián highlights Robles' lack of applause for Sánchez in Congress — Archive photoPhoto: eldiario.es / Alejandro Navarro · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 4.0

Rufián noted that Robles' reaction is significant in the current political context and could generate tensions within the Government, especially considering the seriousness of the crisis addressed by Sánchez.

The situation has sparked an internal debate, with deputies' attention focused on the interaction between the minister and the president, marking a notable moment in Congress.

This item was written by an AI system on the basis of the headlines and short teasers of the independently operating newsrooms named below. We disclose this under Art. 50(4), second subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act). Before publication we check origin and verifiability — anything that appears in only one place is not published — as well as language, substance and legally sensitive content. No separate substantive review of each individual item by a natural person takes place; we therefore do not rely on the exemption in Art. 50(4), second subparagraph, of the AI Act. Editorial responsibility for this publication rests with the person named in the imprint (§ 18 Abs. 2 MStV). Please report errors to [email protected] — we will correct or remove the item. Full reports are available from the sources listed.