Business

Ventura accuses government of alleged 'theft' in fuel charges

André Ventura criticizes the government for charging an excessive amount on fuel, accusing it of imposing an illegal tax.

24 August 2026Tagblick Newsdesk

AI-generatedWritten by an AI system, editorially responsible — how we work

Archive photo: Ventura accuses government of alleged 'theft' in fuel charges — Archive photoPhoto: Threeohsix · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 4.0

André Ventura, the leader of the Chega party, accused the Portuguese government of committing 'theft' in fuel charges, claiming that the amount collected exceeds by 700 million euros what should be charged to citizens. Ventura made these remarks in public statements, criticizing the tax policies implemented by the government.

The politician further emphasized that Portugal continues to impose a tax considered illegal on fuels, specifically referring to the road safety tax. This tax has generated controversy and criticism from various political figures and civil society.

Ventura called on the government to revise its tax practices related to fuels, arguing that the Portuguese people are being harmed by these measures. His intervention comes amid growing concern about fuel prices and their impact on the cost of living.

Ventura's accusations highlight a sensitive point in the country’s fiscal management and reflect broader discontent with government policies. The debate surrounding the legality and fairness of fuel taxes remains a central issue on the political agenda.

This item was written by an AI system on the basis of the headlines and short teasers of the independently operating newsrooms named below. We disclose this under Art. 50(4), second subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act). Before publication we check origin and verifiability — anything that appears in only one place is not published — as well as language, substance and legally sensitive content. No separate substantive review of each individual item by a natural person takes place; we therefore do not rely on the exemption in Art. 50(4), second subparagraph, of the AI Act. Editorial responsibility for this publication rests with the person named in the imprint (§ 18 Abs. 2 MStV). Please report errors to [email protected] — we will correct or remove the item. Full reports are available from the sources listed.