Finance

APTAD points out serious error in new TVDE regulation law

APTAD warned about a serious error in the new TVDE regulation law, which it believes favors platforms over operators and drivers.

26 August 2026Tagblick Newsdesk

AI-generatedWritten by an AI system, editorially responsible — how we work

Archive photo: APTAD points out serious error in new TVDE regulation law — Archive photoPhoto: Manuelvbotelho · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 3.0

The Portuguese Association of Transporters in Unmarked Vehicles (APTAD) expressed concerns on Wednesday regarding Law 59/2026 of the TVDE regime, which was published in the Diário da República on Tuesday. The association considers that the new legislation contains a "serious error" as it protects transportation platforms instead of safeguarding the interests of operators and drivers.

According to alerts issued by APTAD, the changes introduced by the new law could negatively impact the working conditions of those operating under the TVDE regime. The association points to "poor legislative wording" in addressing the transitional regime that applies to this legislation.

APTAD's statements come at a time when changes in the transport sector are being analyzed, with the association highlighting the urgency for correcting the law's text. Greater protection for workers has been one of the demands made by APTAD.

APTAD's criticisms have been widely reported by various media sources that have been following the discussion on the impact of the new legislation in the transport sector. The issue has sparked debates between transport operators and platforms, reflecting the existing tension within the industry.

APTAD continues to call for a revision of the law, believing that a fairer framework could improve working conditions for all professionals in the sector, thus ensuring balanced competition between operators and platforms.

This item was written by an AI system on the basis of the headlines and short teasers of the independently operating newsrooms named below. We disclose this under Art. 50(4), second subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act). Before publication we check origin and verifiability — anything that appears in only one place is not published — as well as language, substance and legally sensitive content. No separate substantive review of each individual item by a natural person takes place; we therefore do not rely on the exemption in Art. 50(4), second subparagraph, of the AI Act. Editorial responsibility for this publication rests with the person named in the imprint (§ 18 Abs. 2 MStV). Please report errors to [email protected] — we will correct or remove the item. Full reports are available from the sources listed.